the Intelligent Age
salon series on the other side of AI alignment
How can society flourish
with powerful AI?
Public reading and discussion series about institutional change
The opening salon
What must be redesigned to
receive AI?
Glen Weyl, James Evans, and Chris White’s proposal have a proposal for “reverse alignment”: redesigning institutions so that capable AI enlarges prosperity, agency, truth, and liberty.
- Main paper
- What Humanity Needs to Flourish in the Next Decade, Noema
- Where
- SoHo · Exact location shared with registered guests
- Registration
- Register on Luma
The premise
Alignment has
two directions.
AI alignment asks how machines can be made compatible with human values.
Reverse alignment asks the reciprocal question: how must our institutions change so AI expands human agency?
proposition
Can reverse alignment become a serious program of institutional change?
8 approaches (and counting..)
-
01
Positive alignment
asks what a flourishing-oriented AI should do.
-
02
Beneficial deployment
asks where AI can do useful work now.
-
03
Pro-worker and human-centered AI
ask which technological trajectories we should encourage.
-
04
Reverse alignment
asks which institutions society must rebuild.
-
05
Full-stack alignment
asks how models, companies, markets and governments can be redesigned as one interconnected system.
-
06
Public-interest technology
asks how technical expertise and institutions can advance public values rather than only private objectives.
-
07
Mission-oriented innovation
asks how governments and coalitions can direct innovation toward concrete social goals.
-
08
Progress studies
asks what makes material, scientific, and institutional progress possible, and how it can be accelerated.
12 sociotechnical challenges
-
001
Identity
Ways to establish that a person, role, or institution is real and accountable without forcing everyone into one universal identity system.
-
002
Privacy
Rules and technical arrangements that preserve consent, context, and freedom from surveillance as AI makes inference dramatically cheaper.
-
003
Provenance
Reliable evidence of where data, media, models, and claims came from, what changed them, and who stands behind them.
-
004
Data value
Institutions for recognizing and sharing the economic value created from people’s data, knowledge, culture, and collective activity.
-
005
Agentic collaboration
How people and AI agents divide work, delegate authority, coordinate across boundaries, and remain accountable for joint outcomes.
-
006
Communal sensemaking
Practices that help groups interpret evidence, surface disagreement, and form a usable picture of reality without manufacturing consensus.
-
007
Democracy
Forms of participation, representation, and deliberation that can use AI without quietly transferring political judgment to platforms.
-
008
Law & liberties
Rights, due process, appeal, and limits on automated power, especially when states or firms can act faster than people can contest them.
-
009
Workplace
Organizational designs that preserve responsibility, worker voice, tacit knowledge, and solidarity as teams become fluid and AI-mediated.
-
010
Research
Methods and institutions that accelerate discovery while protecting verification, intellectual diversity, and the slow work of understanding.
-
011
Education
Learning and assessment built for a world where producing a plausible answer is cheap but forming judgment remains difficult.
-
012
Labor transition
Bargaining power, income, mobility, retraining, and social protection for people whose tasks and occupations are reorganized by AI.
season
7 questions
The season moves from the reverse-alignment thesis toward six domains where institutional imagination is overdue. Each salon centers one required paper, supported by a short list of additional readings.
-
01
Orientation · 12 challenges
What must be redesigned to receive AI?Is reverse alignment a useful program of institutional change?
Tension: Institutional imagination versus technological inevitability.
Readings TBD
Additional readingsDario Amodei · 2026
Policy on the AI Exponential Cited in the main paperCatalini, Hui & Wu · 2026
Some Simple Economics of AGI Cited in the main paperBullock, Hammond & Krier
AGI, Governments, and Free Societies Cited in the main paper -
02
Data value · labor transition
Who gets paid for intelligence?If AI reorganizes value creation at the level of data and tasks, what should replace institutions built around jobs, wages, degrees, and copyright?
Tension: Distributing AI’s gains versus pricing every human activity as an input.
Readings TBD
Additional readingsDario Amodei · 2026
Policy on the AI Exponential, section 2 Cited in the opening Noema essayAstra Taylor · 2018
The Automation Charade CounterpointInternational Labour Organization · 2025
Generative AI and Jobs Empirical background -
03
Agentic collaboration · workplace
The post-org-chart organizationWhat forms of trust are needed when work is performed by shifting teams of people and agents?
Tension: Flexible collective intelligence versus dissolved employment and responsibility.
Readings TBD
Additional readingsValentine et al. · 2017
Flash Organizations Organizational experimentBrynjolfsson, Rock & Syverson · 2021
The Productivity J-Curve Cited in the opening Noema essayCatalini, Hui & Wu · 2026
Some Simple Economics of AGI Cited in the opening Noema essay -
04
Identity · privacy · provenance
Proof without exposureHow can people prove that they are real without submitting to universal surveillance?
Tension: Trustworthy participation versus infrastructure for tracking and exclusion.
Readings TBD
Main paperAdditional readingsRenée DiResta · 2026
We Need a Way to Prove Personhood Online Cited in the opening Noema essaySoliman et al. · 2024
Meronymous Communication Noema lineageMetropolitansky & Larson · 2026
VeriTrail Cited in the opening Noema essaySalomé Viljoen · 2021
A Relational Theory of Data Governance Counterpoint -
05
Research · education
After the essay and the paperWhen generating a plausible answer is cheap, which and knowledge institutions become valuable?
Tension: accelerated inquiry
Readings TBD
Additional readingsDario Amodei · 2026
Policy on the AI Exponential, section 3 Cited in the opening Noema essayDeSci Foundation
The DeSci Movement Cited in the opening Noema essayUNESCO · 2023
Guidance for Generative AI Institutional response -
06
Communal sensemaking · democracy
Can AI help a public think?Can AI-mediated deliberation reveal common ground without manufacturing consensus or giving the platform hidden political power?
Tension: legible public opinion versus hidden power in prompts, clustering, and summary.
Readings TBD
Additional readingsJack Henderson · 2025
The Art of Broad Listening Cited in the opening Noema essayHennyGe Wichers · 2026
Democracy Needs Friction to Function Cited in the opening Noema essaySandman & Gregori · 2020
How Tech Tools Helped Taiwanese Activists Turn a Social Movement Into Real Policy Change Cited in the opening Noema essay -
07
Law · liberties · state capacity
The capable state, constrainedHow can the state gain AI-enabled capacity ?
Tension: more capable public service versus enforcement.
Readings TBD
Additional readingsBullock, Hammond & Krier
AGI, Governments, and Free Societies Cited in the opening Noema essayDario Amodei · 2026
Policy on the AI Exponential, section 4 Cited in the opening Noema essayJennifer Pahlka
Understanding the Cascade of Rigidity Cited in the opening Noema essayDarrell M. West · 2021
Restore the Office of Technology Assessment Cited in the opening Noema essay
In New York
1 room shaped for candor, disagreement, and the beginnings of common work.
How the evening works
135 minutes.
One paper.
Three turns.
-
00:00 25 min00
Arrival
Drinks and unstructured conversation.
-
00:25 5 min01
Welcome
-
00:30 20 min02
Summary explanation
The argument, evidence, and unresolved tension.
-
00:50 15 min03
Understand
Which assumption holds it up, and where does it fail?
-
01:05 15 min04
Apply
Which institution, community, or practice is ready for the test?
-
01:20 15 min05
Build
What would have to change? Name some experiments
-
01:35 40 min06
Socialize
Promising build tables may continue together.
The small-group rule
Never more than five.
People mix between rounds. A group may stay together if they want to keep building.
Open registration · New York City